page:recipes:graphql api:flask:worker state
Host graphql api with Flask: worker execution and job state
Deploy a graphql api built with Flask as a public web service plus a dedicated worker process on Ample. ample plan --write discovers both services and their shared database and writes ample.toml; ample up reconciles the topology: a managed PostgreSQL 16 database, a public web microVM and a private worker microVM (kind worker, no public URL), both reading DATABASE_URL. Verified on Flask: a separately deployed worker service (kind worker, no public URL) sharing a declared managed PostgreSQL database with the web service, consuming a jobs table with row locks and marking jobs done once (worker=done attempts=1). Not separately tested: your job payloads, retry policy and scheduling; treat the graphql api-specific behavior as your application code.
Prerequisites
- A repository with the web app and the worker as separate service directories (the fixture uses apps/web and apps/worker), each building and starting with the documented commands (pip install into .ample/python from requirements.txt, then waitress from app.py reading PORT on the python-3.12 template; the worker starts with python3 worker.py and binds no port)
- Both services read DATABASE_URL at runtime and share one jobs table; the worker claims rows with SELECT ... FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED and marks them done once
- An Ample account token with servers:write and databases:write (ample up creates the database)
Workflow Steps
Plan the topology
Run the planner once. It discovers the web and worker services, infers kind = "worker" for the process without a port, declares the database each service needs, and writes ample.toml. Exit 2 means it left questions in the manifest; answer them with --answer or by editing the file.
Command:ample plan --write .Share one database
Keep a single [databases.main] with engine = "postgres", drop any per-service database the planner added, and set DATABASE_URL = { database = "main" } under both [services.web.env] and [services.worker.env]. Python services also need an explicit start command in the manifest (the fixture sets start for both services).
Command:ample plan --offline .Apply
Reconcile the whole manifest in dependency order: the database first, then both services. It is idempotent and never destructive; exit 0 means everything applied, 2 needs input, 1 a failed resource (independent siblings still proceed and re-running resumes).
Command:ample up .Verify
Fetch the web service URL and its worker status route (/p/worker-queue/status in the example) and confirm the worker processed the enqueued job; on failure read the worker service's runtime logs.
Command:ample logs --kind runtime
Success Checks
- Web service responds on its public URL
- Worker consumed the enqueued job
Limitations
- Verified on the python-3.12 template at s-1vcpu-1gb for both services with the example fixture; other sizes, templates and Flask major versions are not verified.
- The graphql api itself (your job payloads, retry policy and scheduling) is application code and was not separately tested.
- The worker is a single long-running process supervised in its own microVM; there is no scheduler, cron or horizontal worker scaling in this recipe.
Cost Estimate
- Monthly Amount: $15.00
- Components:
- Web server (s-1vcpu-1gb): $5.00
- Worker server (s-1vcpu-1gb): $5.00
- Managed PostgreSQL database (s-1vcpu-1gb): $5.00
Last Verified At
2026-09-20T03:56:46Z
Evidence Summary
- Flask web service plus a separate Python worker process deployed on Ample with
ample plan --writethenample up. The web service enqueued a job that the private worker service consumed from the shared managed PostgreSQL database.