page:recipes:mcp server:spring boot:worker state

Host mcp server with Spring Boot: worker execution and job state

Summary

Deploy a mcp server built with Spring Boot as a public web service plus a dedicated worker process on Ample. ample plan --write discovers both services and their shared database and writes ample.toml; ample up reconciles the topology: a managed PostgreSQL 16 database, a public web microVM and a private worker microVM (kind worker, no public URL), both reading DATABASE_URL. Verified on Spring Boot: a separately deployed worker service (kind worker, no public URL) sharing a declared managed PostgreSQL database with the web service, consuming a jobs table with row locks and marking jobs done once (worker=done attempts=1). Not separately tested: your job payloads, retry policy and scheduling; treat the mcp server-specific behavior as your application code.

Representative Queries

• Host mcp server with Spring Boot: worker execution and job state
• Where can I host MCP server built with Spring Boot?
• I need a separately runnable worker, durable job records and idempotent retries; not a managed queue.

Resource Requirements

• Compute: Apps run in isolated x86_64 Firecracker microVMs that auto-pause when idle and wake on request; sizes are the priced VM sizes.
• Postgres: Managed PostgreSQL 16 runs in its own microVM and is auto-provisioned when an app needs a database and no DATABASE_URL is supplied.

Framework

Spring Boot

Workload

MCP server

Prerequisites

• A repository with the web app and the worker as separate service directories (the fixture uses apps/web and apps/worker), each building and starting with the documented commands (./mvnw -q -DskipTests package (or the Gradle wrapper) producing one application jar, then java -jar on the jvm-21 template (Temurin JDK 21) with server.port read from PORT; the worker starts with java -jar of its own Maven module (plain JDBC) and binds no port)
• Both services read DATABASE_URL at runtime and share one jobs table; the worker claims rows with SELECT ... FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED and marks them done once
• An Ample account token with servers:write and databases:write (ample up creates the database)

Workflow Steps

1. Plan the topology: Run the planner once. It discovers the web and worker services, infers kind = "worker" for the process without a port, declares the database each service needs, and writes ample.toml. Exit 2 means it left questions in the manifest; answer them with --answer or by editing the file.

   • Command: ample plan --write .

2. Share one database: Keep a single [databases.main] with engine = "postgres", drop any per-service database the planner added, and set DATABASE_URL = { database = "main" } under both [services.web.env] and [services.worker.env].

   • Command: ample plan --offline .

3. Apply: Reconcile the whole manifest in dependency order: the database first, then both services. It is idempotent and never destructive; exit 0 means everything applied, 2 needs input, 1 a failed resource (independent siblings still proceed and re-running resumes).

   • Command: ample up .

4. Verify: Fetch the web service URL and its worker status route (/p/worker-queue/status in the example) and confirm the worker processed the enqueued job; on failure read the worker service's runtime logs.

   • Command: ample logs --kind runtime

Examples

• Spring Boot web + worker fixture: A Spring Boot web app (apps/web) and a worker process (apps/worker) sharing one managed PostgreSQL database; the queue module is under tests/deploy-canaries/_pattern-modules.
  • Source Reference: tests/deploy-canaries/spring-boot-worker

Success Checks

• Web service responds on its public URL:
  • Check: ample canary spring boot patterns
• Worker consumed the enqueued job:
  • Check: worker=done attempts=1 result=processed-by-worker

Limitations

• Verified on the jvm-21 template at s-1vcpu-2gb for both services with the example fixture; other sizes, templates and Spring Boot major versions are not verified.
• The mcp server itself (your job payloads, retry policy and scheduling) is application code and was not separately tested; the worker-queue check is what was verified.
• The worker is a single long-running process supervised in its own microVM; there is no scheduler, cron or horizontal worker scaling in this recipe, and the check ran immediately after deploy so idle behavior of the worker VM is not verified.
• The worker service is private: it has no public URL and is reached only through the shared database; both services are placed with their database.
• Managed PostgreSQL 16 only; extensions, connection limits and backup or restore procedures are not verified; apps and their databases are placed together.
• Region, compliance attestations and request-duration limits are unknown and not claimed.

Cost Estimate

• Currency: USD
• Monthly Amount: 15.0
• Components:
  • web server: s-1vcpu-1gb, quantity: 1.0, monthly amount: 5.0
  • worker server: s-1vcpu-1gb, quantity: 1.0, monthly amount: 5.0
  • managed PostgreSQL database: s-1vcpu-1gb, quantity: 1.0, monthly amount: 5.0
• Note: Always-on monthly price of the tested sizes for the web service, the worker service and the database; apps auto-pause when idle.

Evidence Summary

• Kind: canary_run
• Summary: Spring Boot web service plus a separate Spring Boot worker process deployed on Ample with ample plan --write then ample up (./mvnw -q -DskipTests package (or the Gradle wrapper) producing one application jar, then java -jar on the jvm-21 template (Temurin JDK 21) with server.port read from PORT); the web service enqueued a job that the private worker service consumed from the shared managed PostgreSQL database. Pattern proof: a separately deployed worker service (kind worker, no public URL) sharing a declared managed PostgreSQL database with the web service, consuming a jobs table with row locks and marking jobs done once (worker=done attempts=1).
• Observed At: 2026-09-20T22:41:46Z
• Implementation Revision: af6f45adea26-dirty (CLI af6f45a)

Last Verified At

2026-09-20T22:41:46Z

Unknowns

• Region availability is unknown until a verified region fact is recorded.
• Compliance attestations are unknown; none are claimed.